CRIMINOLOGY Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

CRIMINOLOGY - Essay ExampleIt will be argued that both theories lack a raw material explanation of psychology or the human agents involved in criminal behaviour. Thus, while both theories formulate wickedness and deviance on a macro-level, they present problems on the micro level by not providing sufficient explanation for individual deviance. It will be argued that functionalism was a useful model in an date where society was less fragmented, while social skirmish continues to be a useful model because the material conditions underlying crime have persisted. CONFLICT THEORY The notion of action surmisal, is one and only(a) which is grounded or established in the elementary bolshy principle of the class struggle, p. crime as a legal definition of human manner is created by agents of the dominant class in a politically organized society Adler & Adler, Ed., 2000, p. 65. In Marxist terms, what Quinney argues is that the law essentially exists to serve the interests of the rul ing class. Conversely, deviance and the social construction along with the legal constructions of definitions of deviance, has the only agenda of protecting the interests of a particular group of people in society. That is, the interests of those who construct and often put on the law. ... 65 constructions of any given society. In these terms, it can be hold ined that this approach through material measures, is as well as empirical, and as such, this paper is arguing that it provides the most adequate theory in terms of an assimilation of conflict theory, differential association and labeling theory . In this sense, some more comments on the empirical details of conflict theory ought to be raised and examined. A good example of the empirical nature of conflict theory, and by empirical, it is implied in terms of employing a pronounced consideration of material conditions, is the notion of quality. As the author in question argues, the structure of power is also established throu gh wealth, and this represents property. In these terms, property is regarded as one of the most core or central rights within Western industrialized democracies. That is, if it is metropolis and property which are that which determine wealth and power, and in turn, there is a basic desire to maintain this, it follows that by strictly protecting property class interests or class conflict is perpetuated. Another classic component of the theory in question, anticipates how differential theory can improve upon this foundation. In conflict theory, one of the cornerstones for explaining law in terms of class structure, and power relations, is the notion of socialization. To maintain that there is in a sense, a coercive nature to law in the sense that there is a hold fast of the educated and class elite along with, on the other hand, an association which occurs similarly among the more impoverished classes. For instance, it is a statistic of the