Racial Prejudice in British Immigration Policy :: essays research papers

Racial Prejudice in British in-migration indemnityIntroductionThe purpose of this paper is that to highlight what I see as racist, unjust and inhumane elements in Britains immigration system and the civilization of secrecy surrounds it. The permanent residents (who has indefinite leave to remain), central to this discussion not the illegal immigrants and bogus asylum seekers. Also immigrations treatments of raft coming over to Britain for a wander of other reasons and with papers and visas they involve to be accepted abide been highlighted. Mainly my argument is, compared with other countries, UK is more(prenominal) suspicious of all peck entering the country and they discriminate against people from underdeveloped countries. I withdraw read and quoted from various books in the Immigration subject area. Mainly, Ms. Catriona J. MacKenzies dissertation Africans & UK Immigration Controls for the degree of Masters in Social Work & Social Policy, which has been submitted to the U niversity of Glasgow in 1995 greatly helped me to construct this paper. I also conducted a number of interviews in UK and Turkey with individuals with immigration difficulties. I also made extensive use of the Glasgow University Library. Citizenship The membership of individuals in sophisticated democratic societies is marked by the status of citizenship. Those who belong in a given nation-state have documents certifying their membership. More importantly, citizens possess a wide range of civil, political and social rights. The reality has always been roughwhat different. Most nation-states have had groups on their territory not considered capable of belonging, and therefore either denied citizenship or alternatively forced to go through a process of heathenish assimilation in order to belong. Moreover, even those with formal membership have often been denied some of the rights vital to citizenship, so that they have not amply belonged. Discrimination based on class, gender, eth nicity, race, religion and other criteria has always meant that some people could not be full citizens. Securing the participation of previously excluded groups has been seen as the key to democratisation. Nazism and the Final Solution temporarily stigmatised racial-biological thinking after(prenominal) 1945. However, the New Racism that emerged in the 1970s evaded the opprobrium of biological racialism and eugenics by superficially relocating difference away from phenotype and genes and on to culture. This has had dramatic depression on nature and appearance of racism in Britain. By camouflaging transmissible qualities as cultural inheritance, it became possible for mainstream politicians to inject racism back into debates about nationality and citizenship.