'Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer Essay\r'

'â€Å" ii years he walks the earth. No ph whizz, no pool, no pets, no cigargonttes. Ultimate emancipation. An extremist. An aesthetic voyager whose national is THE ROAD,” (163) and with those words, Chris McCand slight declared his independence and walked into the rattling(a) bush of Alaska in may 1992. Little did he fuck that in three short months, his decaying remains would be strand by moose hunting watchs, exclusively a few miles from where he began his journey along the stampede Trail.\r\nChris McCandless’s story, which was ret previous(a) in entirelyt Krakaur’s book, Into the Wild, is a original testament to the idea of freedom and independence that has powered the foot of American society. Chris McCandless had evermore marched to the flash of his protest drummer, as did umteen American heroes. heretofore when he was a child, Chris was k right offn for organism overly adventurous and a little less than cautious. This big brain of adventu re scare Chris’s family and friends ever since they nonice it when he was just a child.\r\nBecause of this, his parents were horrified, further not all(a) in all shocked, when peerless day Chris deceased from his typical emotional state in Atlanta, Georgia and was never hear from by his family again. As a graduate of Emory College, Chris’s rising potential would have been closely unlimited; he had so frequently ahead of him but threw it all external and fatigued the rest of his emotional state on the road. What McCandless was searching for by departure his safe carriage cannot be easily understood by most, but galore(postnominal) transcendentalists dual-lane a similar arrest of Chris’s â€Å"call to nature.\r\n transcendentalism rejects typical culture or society and is often tag by a hunch forward of nature and a inquisition for a greater convey of life. Many parallels can be drawn between Chris McCandless’s story and the stories f rom authors such as Walt Whitman. Many transcendentalists uniform Walt Whitman and Chris McCandless form to the unfastened road to ingest a better soul of life, but in doing this, Chris puts his â€Å" estimable future(a)” in risk of infection by abandoning his former identity, grown up all of his possessions, and relying whole on the disembark.\r\nChris gives up his life of bail when he decides to bowdlerize his whole identity. Although Chris was raised in a seemingly annoyed knit family, in college he discovered that his parents’ marriage was the issuing of an affair, and his father maintained a bigamous relations for ii years (121). afterward that disco truly, Chris started to resent his parents, especially his father. His rank(a) crossness towards his parents is what final examinationly caused Chris to wholly roll in the hay them off from his life as he ventured into the wild.\r\nIn his two years being away from home, Chris’s family ne ver perceive from him once; even his sister, Carine, who was very close to Chris, never utter to him again. Chris’s sudden absence seizure in his family’s life hurt each fellow member deeply. His father even questions, â€Å"How is it that a kid with so much compassion could cause his parents so much pain? ” (104). Although he k invigorated he was hurting his family by change by reversal, Chris’s lack of irritation for his family members stemmed from the hurt he felt that they each caused him.\r\nWalt Whitman’s char conducter in poetry of the Open Road does not find it as easygoing as Chris did to leave the old butt. The speaker system of the poem writes, â€Å" appease here I scat my old delicious burdens, I carry them, men and women, I carry them with me wherever I go. ” This line shows that the author pacify carries memories and feelings from his old life with him on a daily basis, which exemplifies how effortful they are t o forget. This regretful berth contrasts to that of Chris’s in that the speaker doesn’t want to completely leave the historic cigaret but desires to recall his memories during future journeys.\r\nnot only did Chris instantaneously cut off his family in secernate to leave his old life behind, but he in any case adopted a pseudonym that he felt was more fitting to his juvenile personality. Kraukauer describes Chris’s final switch and says, â€Å"No lifelong would he answer to Chris McCandless; he was now Alexander Supertramp, master of his own destiny” (23). This new, outrageous realize truly enabled Chris to leave his past of reason and sanctuary behind and move forward to his new life of freedom and adventure.\r\nNot only did Chris completely misrepresent his identity but his absolute resignation of realismly positions also put his future safety at risk. Before leaving for his journey and without his parents’ knowledge, Chris donated h is entire college fund containing 25,000 dollars to OXFAM, a hunger temperance charity (20). This gesture unfeignedly proves Chris’s complete release of security and lack of friendship for worldly possessions. afterwards jump his long journey with no m 1(a)y, Chris close to immediately inclined his old yellow Datsun in a riverbed in the Lake Mead National Recreation area.\r\nHe decided to do this afterwards a flash runoff wets the cars engine as a result of his failure to live the flood z single word of advice signs. In reality, Chris could have set up a way to bring through his car but quite was exhilarated by the resultant role and saw it as â€Å"an fortune to shed unnecessary luggage” (29). At the same time, Chris burned-out his detain small derive of money and â€Å"one nose candy and twenty-three dollars was promptly lessen to ash and smoke” (29). After this, Chris’s journey was one that literally started from energy; He had no money, no car, no fodder, and no one but himself.\r\nChris’s dire invite to get rid of each worldly possession greatly endangered his life. The speaker in Walt Whitman’s poem agrees with Chris’s opinion that worldly possessions are unimportant. When the speaker says, â€Å"You shall not galvanic pile up what is call’d riches, you shall scatter with lavish softwood all that you earn or achieve,” he is expressing his be dwellf that wealthiness should be shared among many and not kept for one individual. Chris really exemplifies this concept by donating all of his money to those who were less fortunate than him. Chris’s last major risk to his life and security is his excursion to Alaska.\r\nAfter a year and a half of traveling darling the United States, Chris finally mean his trip to Alaska, which had always been his termination goal. Chris went into his journey extremely faint equipped for the harsh months that would lie ahead of him in the Alaskan bush. Jim Gallien, an experienced woodsman who gave Chris a ride to the Stampede Trail, depict Chris as having nowhere near as much food and gear as would be expected for that kind of trip (4). The only food Chris brought with him was a ten-pound bag of rice; he planned on guessing the rest of his food with a gun that by Gallien’s standards was too small to putting to death any major game.\r\nWhen questioned repeatedly on his plans for survival, Chris confidently conscious Gallien, â€Å"I am absolutely positive I won’t run into anything I cant deal with on my own” (6). Chris’s positivistic attitude is what angered many experienced woodsman who replied to Krakauer’s first article near Chris. They complained that Chris was just foolish and wide-eyed for thinking he could recurrence on Alaska alone with almost no experience or gear. One Alaskan hunter even states that only one word can marrow up Chris McCandless: incompet ent (177). Chris didn’t see his life resembling this however.\r\nHe felt alert and excited for anything the world could take in at him. His completely believed in himself and lived by the notion that nothing or no one could discourage him from his journey. The speaker in Walt Whitman’s poem is extremely similar to Chris McCandless in the sense that they both lived to travel the â€Å"open road” in order to experience life to the fullest. Whitman’s speaker says, â€Å"Afoot and light-hearted I take to the open road, healthy, free, the world before me, the long embrown avenue before me tether wherever I choose. two the speaker and Chris have an consider view of living on the road and will not let anything deter them from it.\r\nthroughout his early life, Chris somewhat conformed to the traditionalistic values and ideals encouraged by his parents and society. It wasn’t until he grew erstwhile(a) that he decided to act upon his yearning esca pe it all and to travel and live in nature. He left his old, unafraid(p) life behind for one filled with adventure, mystery, and danger. This action, which was looked down upon by many members of society, directly relates Chris to transcendentalist beliefs like those of Walt Whitman.\r\nChris put his safety and security on the line by renouncing his former name, giving up worldly possessions, and venturing out in dangerous in orthogonal territory and these choices ultimately caused him his life. Even though it may not have been seen as logical by many, Chris created his own path in life, and although it led to his death, the peregrine experience was what he always desired. Chris writes at the beginning of his final decent into nature, â€Å"No longer to be poisoned by elegance he flees, and walks alone upon the land to become Lost in the Wild” (163).\r\n'