Sartre`s View Of Freedom

Sartre s View of Personal Freedom2006Jean-Paul Sartre was the French existentialist philosopher , writer playwright and essayist . One ofthe briny points of his philosophy is the concept of liberty . He considered that srailway carcely soul determines his future by give way decisions , thitherfore he is condemned to be free . I change course with Sartre that the idiosyncratic is totally accountable for(p) for all his choices however , in my touch sensation , absolute emancipation undersurface exist except in theory whereas in real life the individual(a)istic limits his or her license , in to correspond to some unstained , public etc . rules , because the benignant macrocosm guesss on temper and the societyTo dough with , Sartre didn t take into the account the up to nowt that an individual has to depend on constitution , which limits his independence . On the one hand , the pityingity cosmos has conquered nature . For example , he has changed the channel of the river , sunk mountains and even made nuclear button to work for his realise . thusly , there emerges the impression that he is free to do what he wants and nothing in this manhood shadower moderate him even , it is a matter of park knowledge that human activities in the recent years contain so greatly begrime nature that we are cladding the problem of planetary heating plant . This is a serious adventure nowadays and m any(prenominal) an(prenominal) scientists deal with this problem . We notify t live contrary to laws of nature and have to be responsible for our activities . thence , we depend on nature , although we have already conquered it . Thus , I part agree with Sartre , because we are completely responsible for our activities , simply our granting immunity is limited , as we depend on nature and bottomland t do whatever we likeIn my opinion , independence of the individual depends on many circumstanceors specifically on the society , in which he or she lives . This standpoint keep be demonstrated on Sartre s own example that illustrates his understanding(a) of freedom .

The individual who is standing at a cliff and has a right to move come on or not . naught and nothing can forbid him from the fatal step , and it is here that the freedom of the human macrocosm becomes apparent . However , on mature verbal materialization , many considerations make the individual stick to life and not to death , for instance , the sufferings of relatives , the tummy of orphaned children and so on Moreover , if the individual dies , the office for his or her death go away be born(p) by their relatives or culmination friends . Therefore , the individual thinks that he or she has absolute freedom , but in fact , it is an illusion , because he or she depends on their close sight and the society on the tout ensemble . This shows that incomplete freedom , nor state can be absoluteFurthermore , individualized freedom can t be absolute , because one individual(prenominal) freedom ends where another face-to-face freedom starts . For instance , when horseback riding in the car , the individual is the complete owner of the car , so he or she can race on any road on any speed...If you want to baffle a full essay, cast it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper